![]() | ||
|
The United States was founded on the premise of
being free from government, being able
to express ones religious beliefs without ridicule,
and raising a strong united family.
Take a look around you. Ever since the end of World War II, the very fabric of what made this country great has disappeared. Strong willed men, a solid educational process that educated boys and girls, law and order, respect and discipline, and a high quality of life with little government intervention has been replaced with feminism, an education system that caters to girls and demeans boys, watered down laws that give criminals more rights than honest decent citizens, crude and rude behavior, and the elimination of a strong middle class. How much longer must we as a country put up with this? Our two political parties have sold us out. Neither party truely wants a strong nation, only if it is in their best interest. Government telling us when we can see our kids isn't freedom. Government telling us that we must pay for programs that fail isn't being free either. And for men to have to tolerate a corrupt legal system that favors women and destroys men isn't freedom. And an education system, media, and entertainment industry that force feeds lies, propaganda, and misleads everyone to become bitter towards true democracy and divides homes has made the problems worse. The times have changed, and not for the better. Its time to take a stand and take back this country. The premise of this nation, limited government, personal responsibility, strong united families, and a solid education system that educates equally, is the only way this nation will ever be great again.
Declaration of IndependenceUS Constitution Bill of Rights Congressional Record US Supreme Court |
Study: Kids need fathers --W. L.Comments? Write Fathers' involvement and children's developmental outcomes: a systematic review of longitudinal studies Anna Sarkadi 1,4, Robert Kristiansson 2, Frank Oberklaid 3, Sven Bremberg 4 Objective: This systematic review aims to describe longitudinal evidence on the effects of father involvement on children's developmental outcomes. Methods: Father involvement was conceptualized as accessibility (cohabitation), engagement, responsibility or other complex measures of involvement. Both biological fathers and father figures were included. We searched all major databases from the first dates. Data on father involvement had to be generated at least 1 year before measuring offspring outcomes. Results: N = 24 publications were included in the overview: 22 of these described positive effects of father involvement, whereof 16 studies had controlled for SES and 11 concerned the study population as a whole [five socio-economic status (SES)-controlled]. There is certain evidence that cohabitation with the mother and her male partner is associated with less externalising behavioural problems. Active and regular engagement with the child predicts a range of positive outcomes, although no specific form of engagement has been shown to yield better outcomes than another. Father engagement seems to have differential effects on desirable outcomes by reducing the frequency of behavioural problems in boys and psychological problems in young women, and enhancing cognitive development, while decreasing delinquency and economic disadvantage in low SES families. Conclusions: There is evidence to support the positive influence of father engagement on offspring social, behavioural and psychological outcomes. Although the literature only provides sufficient basis for engagement (direct interaction with the child) as the specific form of 'effective' father involvement, there is enough support to urge both professionals and policy makers to improve circumstances for involved fathering. Correspondence: A Sarkadi, Dept. of Women's and Chidren's Health, Unit for Child Public Health, Uppsala Academic Hospital, Gate 17, 751 85 Uppsala, Sweden. Tel: +46 18 611 59 65 | Fax: +46 18 50 45 11 | Email: Anna.Sarkadi@kbh.uu.se
1.Department of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Sweden
2.Centre of Clinical Research, Västerås County, Sweden 3.Centre for
Community Child Health, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
4.National Institute of Public Health, Östersund, Sweden
|
COMMENTARY: A Failed society Abortion: Don't do it Affirmative Action Quotas And women are better? Attack on christianity Be a real man Broken promises, broken homes FemiNAZIS Feminism lies: the facts Feminism wrong: two womens view Flag Burning Global Warming Illegals: Who's coming in Immigrants: Speak English Insurance and Taxes Just as violent, if not more so: Women Just Because? Labor Unions Law and order Liberalism IS a mental disorder Male Role Models Marxism alive in the US(sr) Our lives at stake Our rights Parenting Political Correctness? Polls Quotable facts Pt. 1 Quotable facts Pt. 2 Say no to queers Study: Kids need fathers Pt. 1 Study: Kids need fathers Pt. 2 Talk Radio Taxation Terrorist mindset The ACLU The courts The double standard The economic meltdown: The real cause The lies they use The numbers don't lie The Ten Commandments The times have changed: Schools The Truth about Democrats THEY can do it, but men can't? Turnabout What would the first GW say? Which way to freedom? You are part of the problem if.. |