Man who isn't dad still has to pay


Appeal is denied despite DNA test
By Ralph R. Ortega Star-Ledger Staff
01-28-08

A Hunterdon County divorcé who claimed he discovered he was not the father of a 10-year-old girl was denied his appeal to lower his child support payments, according to an opinion handed down this week by the state Appellate Division. . . . An appeals court on Wednesday affirmed an October 2006 decision made by state Superior Court Judge Stephen Rubin in Flemington against the request made by the man, identified in court papers only as W.S.Y. Jr. to protect the child's identity. . . . W.S.Y. said a paternity test proved he was not the biological father of the child, whom he thought he had conceived with his ex-wife when they were still married. . . . He went before Rubin seeking disclosure of the identity of the child's real father, appointment of a mental health counselor to address paternity issues, and reduced child support, including reimbursement for support previously paid retroactive to the child's birth. . . . The opinion, referring to the child by her initials, F.Y., states the appeals panel was satisfied with the way Rubin made his decision against the requests.

source